Reflections
These notes are shaped by my two most significant inspirations, Advaita Vedanta and the Bhagavad Gita, not as ideas to admire, but as something that carried me through my hardest stretch.
I
Thoughts and feelings.
Pain is real. A loss, a failure, an illness that hurts, the silence where a voice used to be. None of us gets through life without it.
Suffering is the story we add to a painful event: why me, what if, this is unacceptable. When we say time heals, it's because we gradually move on from the suffering narrative. Once we recognize this, we can heal sooner.
When it hurts, notice the thought that comes with it, like it isn't fair, and come back to the plain feeling. Where is it in the body? What is it actually like, without the story? Often it is more bearable than we feared. The feeling can be felt and released. It's the loop that wears us down.
While pain isn't pleasant, it often helps us grow in ways we couldn't have planned. Acceptance and courage are two such lessons.
"Why are you crying?" We hear these words early on. But the why is often not about what caused the tears. It's a judgement on crying itself: a weakness we don't want children to show.
When a natural expression is shut down, it can come out in other ways, such as screaming or hitting, and then it hurts others too.
We enter the world with a cry. We leave with one. Yet, as we grow up, many of us hold back tears. Letting ourselves cry, without apology, is not weakness. It's how pain naturally moves through us instead of staying stuck.
Let it out.
Anger isn't unnatural, but it never helps. At the core, we are pure love. As we grow, we learn attachment, expectations, develop an ego self, and our idea of what's acceptable or not, when in reality acceptance isn't a choice. Every time the ego's demand goes unmet, the same energy that was love curdles into anger. Anger is love distorted by ego: love with a condition attached.
Anger always needs a target, mostly something outside: an unmet expectation, an insult to our sense of worth, and so on. Remove the target and it has nothing to hold; it burns out on its own. That's why pause and respond works: the space helps anger dissipate. It's borrowed fire, dependent on a situation for its fuel, unlike peace, which needs no reason at all.
Anger never changed anything for the better and always cost me my peace. So today, instead of getting triggered by a situation, I remind myself that nothing is worth my inner peace.
Healing from grief isn't linear. There are times we think we have moved on, and then it strikes so hard, as if it was just yesterday that we lost the one we are grieving and we haven't moved an inch. Pain is real, and living it completely is therapeutic.
We lose someone. We build something and it comes apart: a bond, a chapter of life, a version of ourselves. Loss appears as grief over time. Grief isn't a punishment for having loved. It is separation from what was loved with such intensity that we couldn't imagine separation.
The Bhagavad Gita states that attachment is the cause of grief. Presence and love are not. The breath exemplifies it constantly, every inhale and then the letting go of the exhale. Holding and releasing are not opposites; they are one rhythm. Loss is that contrast, without which nothing can really be felt. Birth and death are the truest embodiment of this contrast. Without death, the experience of life won't be what it is.
As we learn to be in the present, the grip of past memories of the one we lost, and the anxieties of future without them start to loosen.
On a spiritual level, when we identify as the soul or awareness, we recognize grief is in the mind, which is an identity we are used to, but is not our innate self. The more we recognize and remember that we are the awareness, in which life and thoughts appear, like scenes on a screen, we can be a witness, like the one watching a movie of life, and this too shall pass. A new scene will appear and then another. The beginning and end don't stain the one in which they appear.
Our self worth is built upon how we are perceived by others or how we fare in comparisons. That's why sometimes, when we see others doing better than us, it induces a feeling of not being good enough.
It never settles, because the standard keeps moving. Whatever we reach, someone is further along. Social media makes this more apparent, but it was always there. It only got magnified: now we know more about others' lives and therefore more ways to fall short.
Interestingly, children don't care what others think or compare themselves, until taught to. If they like to sing or dance, they just do it for joy, not to be better than someone, or to impress someone. Gradually, the child is taught comparison, achievement, success, failure and the labels of good and bad they carry. We learn this, which means it isn't innate. It's a habit, and habits can be unlearned.
Comparison is a groove worn deep by years of repetition, and analyzing it doesn't instantly stop it. Underneath all of it, is the thing worth remembering: we were never lacking. We have our unique idea of joy, of expressing freely, our own story, purpose, and our own timeline. Someone being further along their road tells us nothing about ours. We are not even on the same road.
The sense of "not enough" is a story the mind learned, not a fact about us. There is no one to catch up to. There never was.
So I now do everything for the joy of expressing and experiencing: I write, sing, work, play tennis. In my mind, the score is always Love All, quite literally. Love yourself, love everyone and celebrate their joy like you celebrate yours. The comparison will subtly shift to inspiration.
Self-doubt isn't really doubt about what we can do. Underneath it is doubt about who we are, and it comes from mistaking one thing for another.
We build a self out of what we achieve, what others think, the roles we hold. Then we spend our lives trying to grow it: more success, more approval, more proof that we're enough. But a self built this way can never be secure, because it depends entirely on things outside our control. When the achievement fails, the approval fades, the role is lost, that self collapses, and we feel worthless, lost, as if we had failed. But it wasn't us that failed. It was a picture of us we'd mistaken for the real thing.
Think of a painting and the canvas it's painted on. Paintings can be compared: this one grander, that one plainer. The canvas can't. It simply holds whatever appears on it, unchanged. What we compare and doubt is paint: our careers, our looks, our milestones. The one it all appears on was never in the competition, and can't be added to or diminished by any of it.
So the answer to self-doubt isn't to build a better, more bulletproof version of the achieving self. That self will always have a crack that comparison finds. The answer is to notice we were never the painting. We are the canvas: already whole, already enough, before a single stroke was laid down. Nothing needs to be earned. Something only needs to be remembered.
There's a line I come back to: sochte rehne se hota hi kya hai, jo hota hai karne se hota hai. What does endless thinking ever accomplish? What happens, happens by doing.
Thinking with the intention of taking a decision is helpful. Thinking on and on is a loop: the same problem turned over and over, the conversation rehearsed for the fortieth time, the plan refined but never begun. And it feels like work. That's the trap. One of my favourite songs in college was "Ab Khud Kuch Karna Padega," a song saying it's time to act. And the only act I engaged in was to replay the song countless times. The mind replaying a thing feels like progress, while nothing actually moves.
The ability to think is beautiful. The obsession, or the addiction, is no better than any other obsession, however intelligent or intellectually stimulating it may feel. When the thinking has stopped deciding and started circling, the answer isn't more thinking. Get up. Do the next small real thing.
I've had quite a run against my own mind: trying to tame it, silence it, escape it. But the mind was never the problem. It is a beautiful instrument through which consciousness experiences and recognizes itself. Without it there is illumination, but nothing in focus, nothing tasted.
But it swings, like a pendulum, between poles: hero and villain, hope and despair, holding on and letting go. And it focuses, like a lens, narrowing onto one face, one memory, one moment in particular. The swinging and the focusing are not flaws.
Getting stuck is the problem: the pendulum caught at one pole exhibits extreme behaviour, the lens jammed at one focal length isn't able to move on. When stuck, a passing storm starts to look like the whole sky.
What frees it is not force. Every attempt to control the mind eventually fails, because the force is mind itself. What frees it is recognition: beneath every swing there is a still fulcrum the whole thing hangs from, and the lens is made of the very light it focuses. The moment we recognize that the stillness and the light were never elsewhere, the grip releases on its own. Nothing is pried open. Gradually the recognition becomes memory, and it gets easier for the mind to be unstuck.
The ego isn't arrogance or vanity. Those are its louder manifestations. At the root, ego is the sense of being a separate self: the one who claims identity and ownership. This happened to me. I am this. I did this. It's the voice that turns every experience into a possession, and every possession into something to defend.
The real battlefield is in the heart: a war between love and possession. And the trap is that we cannot win that war. The ego trying to defeat the ego is the ego at its maximum: effort fighting effort, producing no peace at all. Every attempt to crush it feeds it, because there's still a "me" working hard to be egoless.
So it isn't defeated. It's seen through. When we look closely for the separate self that's supposedly running everything, we find no solid thing there, only a habit of claiming.
As a rule of thumb, any thought that takes peace away, turns love into pain or anger and makes us pretend or lie is arising out of the ego self. Our soul or the real self resides forever in bliss. So when ego manifests resentment towards others, anger, despair, label them and treat them with love. Self-talk that lets ego have a hearing, space and healing goes a long way in resolving the conflict within.
The ego was never an enemy to be beaten. It was only a case of mistaken identity, and mistaken identity ends not by force, but by recognition.
The mind is free. That's the gift. It can imagine anything, travel to any moment in the past or an anticipated future. But the freedom to imagine is also the freedom to revisit the same thoughts, to replay the same old wound. A mind in pain is drawn to unanswerable questions the way a tongue keeps going to a broken tooth. It's often said that as much as 95% of our thoughts are recycled.
This is why the cage is always self-made: not because anyone chose imprisonment, but because we don't recognize the thought loops for what they are.
And we can't escape a self-made cage by building a better one. Discipline against a wandering mind is just the mind patrolling itself. The way out isn't more control. It's noticing the loop as a loop. The repetition itself is the clue: it's how we catch that we're going in circles. So the question to keep asking is a simple one: am I moving, or am I going around again? If it's the second, nothing needs forcing. Just observe, and stop feeding the circle, and the lens of the mind gets unstuck.
Consciousness is what powers every experience. Whatever we put its might behind gets illumined. A thought has no power of its own until our attention falls on it and makes it vivid.
When a painful thought arrives, there's often a pull to engage it, to hear it out one more time, in case something was missed. But engaging is how we feed it our light. When we simply acknowledge it, without engaging, we don't lend it that power, and it drops on its own.
Sometimes we engage out of fear, thinking that if we don't do something about a thought, it will engulf us. That's the trap. How can a thought engulf consciousness, the very medium it exists in? How can a tsunami engulf the ocean, or a storm engulf the space it moves in?
A mark on stone stays forever. Water is impossible to write on. So is the difference between the ego and the soul: between living in the past and being in the present.
The ego is stone. It keeps carving: I was mistreated, I failed, I can get away with anything, I own this, lost that. Every wound dated, every grievance preserved and legible, and every attainment bragged about. It mistakes the depth of the groove for truth. But a groove is just repetition. To live in the past is to live on stone, running our fingers over inscriptions the chisel finished long ago.
Water doesn't refuse the writing. It flows before the mark has any identity. No surface that needs to keep the record. That isn't absence of memory. It's a presence so complete it doesn't need an identity. Stone seems permanent and water seems fragile, yet it was water that carved every canyon on earth. The thing that holds no inscription reshapes the thing that holds them all.
When something painful comes, there's a pull to get over it quickly, to be done with it, to prove we've healed. But grief isn't something to rush or perform. Some waves are owed more soaking than others. A small loss may pass in an afternoon; a deeper one may take far longer, and it should.
The freedom isn't in grieving fast. It's in grieving completely: letting the wave finish at its own pace, instead of either clinging to it or forcing it down. Give each one what it's owed, without watching the clock. Felt fully, it moves through on its own. That's how it was always meant to work.
The hardest person to forgive is usually ourselves. I blamed myself for a long time, and learning to loosen that blame has been the hardest work of all. The question that haunted me was how could this have happened through me, and I've had to accept that some questions may never fully be answered.
But somewhere in it, a distinction became clear. Guilt has a purpose. Looking back and knowing we did wrong is the conscience working exactly as it should. Guilt is not evidence that we are broken at the core; it is evidence that our conscience is intact. Someone truly without one feels nothing at all.
Self-punishment is different. It takes the guilt and loops it, endlessly, with no resolution. And it repairs nothing. It doesn't undo what happened, it doesn't heal anyone who was hurt, it only keeps the wound open, including in us. The mind, left to it, becomes its own worst enemy.
What I did in a moment when I was not myself was real, and its consequences were real; I don't diminish any of that. But a storm passing through is not the sky. The damage a storm does is real, and it still isn't the true nature of the weather. Who we are is not our worst moment.
This is why forgiving ourselves isn't indulgence. It's preparation. A person crushed under their own guilt has less of themselves to give to the people who need them. Setting it down isn't letting ourselves off. It's getting ready to be fully present, which is the only thing that ever really serves anyone.
Not the gritted-teeth kind. That's just suppression, not acceptance. Real acceptance arrives on its own, when the demand that things be otherwise puts itself down.
And it isn't resignation. Resignation says, nothing I do matters, so I give up. Acceptance says, the outcome was never mine to control, so I act as cleanly as I can and let go of the result. Full effort, no clinging to how it turns out.
When it came, hope took its exit, and what was left wasn't the peace of getting what I wanted. It was something underneath all that: a ground that doesn't move when the circumstances move.
Karma is usually pictured as a cosmic ledger. A record kept somewhere, rewarding and punishing us across lifetimes. There's another aspect to it however: the act carries its effect inside it.
Love resonates; resentment grinds. It's more like acoustics: act in tune, and there's ease; act against the grain of who we are, and there's friction. When we act out of love, peace, and truth, we remain in bliss, because it's aligned with our innate self. Conversely, anger, envy, and pretense make us feel uncomfortable and disrupt the inner peace right away. In both cases, the outcome hasn't even arrived yet, but the karma is felt instantaneously.
The world's echo, the outward result, does tend to follow, but loosely, and on its own schedule. Do the thing because it rings true, not to collect what it might return. No ledger, no lifetimes, no faith required: just learning, slowly, to play in tune.
The Gita says we have a right to our actions, never to their outcomes, and we assume this means renunciation or sacrifice: do the work, give up the reward. But there's a simpler truth underneath it. The act is its own fruit. Nothing is being given up, because there was never a separate reward waiting downstream. The fruit was inside the act the whole time, delivered in the moment of doing.
A song sung, a poem written, a smile that no one notices, a letter written to someone who may never respond: all complete the moment they are expressed. Showing up on a hard day is paid at the moment we show up. What we call "the outcome" (the reply, the result, the praise, the reunion) is the echo: real, audible, arriving on its own schedule, sometimes never, but always a separate thing from the act itself. The joy of action and expression itself is the sought-after release.
Nature teaches us this. A bird singing at dawn isn't doing it for an audience, and a wave doesn't rise to reach the shore. Rising is simply what the ocean does. Nothing in creation acts to collect a result; the sun rises, the stars twinkle, the heart beats a billion times without once asking what for. Only the human mind invented the question, and then carried it like a weight for a lifetime. Set it down, and we get to be like the rest of it again.
Nothing pending. Nothing owed. Nothing to wait for. Pure bliss of expressing ourselves.
We usually think of grace as the good thing that happens: the call we were waiting for, the near-miss, the door that opens. But that makes God a dispenser of preferences, handing out favourable weather.
Grace is the love and light underneath everything. It is always there, in every circumstance, veiled by the mind, its thoughts and its beliefs. It doesn't arrive and it doesn't leave. Only the veils move.
What we miss is that grace is not in the event, but in the ability to view it wholly, without a flavor. When something hard arrives, the mind's first move is to split it into the part we wanted and the part we feared, and then live in that split, calling it good news or bad. Grace is when the seeing comes whole instead, before the mind has seasoned it into victory or defeat.
Sri Ramakrishna said, the winds of grace are always blowing, but you have to raise the sail. The winds don't need arranging. The raising is ours.
We hold on: to relationships, to joyful memories, to past grudges or to an imagined outcome. Hope, after all, is the easiest thing to hold on to; it feels virtuous, so we rarely question it. I couldn't understand why holding on wasn't helpful.
It's counterintuitive, but Newton's third law applies here as well: every force meets an equal and opposite one. Whatever we hold on to, we're held by. I thought I was the one holding the grudge or the outcome. It was holding me, deciding where I could stand, and how much of the present was even available to me.
So letting go isn't generosity toward the thing we release. It's the recognition of who was captive all along. We were never holding it, it was holding us. Joy cannot be found anywhere but in the present, and even that can't be held.
They say time heals everything. But how much time? It could be the blink of an eye, or a lifetime: an exhale, or years of smothering.
The truth is, the past is past the moment it's gone. We just find the recent past harder to get over, because the mind likes to cling. It's like a monkey holding onto one banana tree while the rest of us keep walking forward. The further we walk, the more the stretch strains, until the grip either snaps or we let go.
So "how much time?" has a plain answer: exactly as long as we hold on, not a day more. Time doesn't heal. It just stretches, until the distance finally loosens our grip. The real freedom is opening our hand before it's torn open. Notice the breath: it takes in and lets go twenty thousand times a day without once clinging to a good one. Only the mind ever invented holding.
Two states throw us, and each has its own correction, in opposite directions.
When the ego swells and we feel like the whole world turns on us, zoom in. Go smaller and smaller: past the roles, past the name and fame, down to being a speck in an unimaginably vast universe. At that scale, what is there to defend? The self shrinks past the size the ego needs to operate, and the grasping simply lets go.
When pain overwhelms and we feel like the wound is all there is, do the opposite: zoom out. Rise up and up until the thing crushing us is one feature in an enormous landscape. Real, still there, but no longer the whole map. Because we are the map, and the pain is a single place on it. We're bigger than this. We always were.
Once we've moved both ways a few times, we notice something subtle underneath: at some point we no longer need to zoom in or out at all. There's no fixed size to return to, and nothing left to measure ourselves against. That effortless evenness, needing neither to shrink nor to expand, is peace itself.
My biggest fears were being alone, and losing those I loved most. I carried them since childhood. A fear we avoid grows to the full size of our imagination, larger every year.
In my case, life walked me straight through both of them. I'm not saying we have to go looking for our fears. That was simply how I had to meet mine. But going through them showed me that beneath the fear was courage, veiled.
There's a gentler door to the same place. When we truly live in acceptance and awareness, there is nothing left to fear, because even the worst coming true would be acceptable. Fear only survives on the belief that some outcomes must not be allowed to happen. Let that go, and the fear has nothing left to stand on.
Death was a mystery I couldn't understand, like birth, like the meaning of life, like the question of who I am. What unsettled me wasn't the physical fact of it, but the not knowing what it was, and why. Losing someone to it, or losing myself to it, would keep me awake since childhood. I would have visions of being in space, with nothing and no one around, except for the question that never left: Who Am I?
I've come to meet it through the one rehearsal we all get, every single night. When we fall asleep, we let go completely. The world dissolves. The body is released. In deep sleep there is no "you" that you recognise: no name, no story, no sense of a self at all. The breath could stop; the heart could stop; we wouldn't know. And yet something registers even that absence, because we wake and say, I slept well, I remember nothing. Who knew the nothing? Something was present through the whole night, untouched by the world's disappearance. That something is what we are.
At night we release everything without terror, and call it rest. In a way, we experience death daily, the world dissolving, the body set down, awareness continuing as it always has. That makes me wonder if death is a sleep our body and mind don't wake up from.
The nightly cycle suggests that awareness survives the loss of the world and the body-sense. Whether it survives the body's final failure is the one step scripture asserts and no one can verify from this side.
Whether death is a reaching for the next shore, or simply the final dreamless rest, both are the same letting-go we practice every night, and in neither is the water lost. Whether it dissolves like a wave does, or evaporates into the air, it remains water. It cannot drown.
When we're in despair, we reach for hope. And hope works, the way a rope works for someone stuck in a well. It pulls us up. But the rope is not the ground. It's still the well.
Hope lives in the future. It says, I'll be okay once this is resolved. I'll be at peace once the storm passes. So peace is always one outcome away, never quite here. And despair is the same thing in reverse: the mind leaning into a future it has already decided is dark.
One builds castles in the air, the other digs graves in the ground. Both are just something the mind builds. Neither is the ground we're actually standing on.
I'm on a path. It's uncharted, and it's not advised. But something in me tells me it is the only path for me.
I do not seek relief. I do not want a routine that helps me feel normal or occupied. I do not want company born out of boredom. I don't even understand boredom, for it visits those with nothing to do and those with more than they can bear, and everyone in between.
I do not want relief in meditation, or even in devotion, at least not for now. I want to be present, wholly and fully. If there is a storm, I will not turn away. I want to stay. I want to face it all, to know what a storm truly is.
If I have learned anything through this journey, it is to trust myself. To trust even when nothing goes my way, when everyone walks away while I stay.
There is nowhere to go, really. There is only the illusion of escape. There is no escape.
I have no desire these days, not even to prove myself, not even to my own sense of worth. None whatsoever.
It is gloomy, no doubt. But isn't weather like that sometimes? Isn't a tunnel like that? Isn't grief?
I will walk through the tunnel even when there is no light flickering at the end. If there is light, it will find its own way. And if there is none, who am I to demand it?
Darkness has its own charm. It lets you be, only we do not want it to be.
There is a strange solace in darkness, like a winding road almost home at dusk, tired from the day. Like the night offering rest to a weary traveler. Like silence sitting beside a broken hope.
I do not want it any other way. No scripture. No religion. No God. Nothing.
I've often wondered why this catastrophic path was the one my life chose for me to awaken. And it isn't only my story. It's strangely common. The Buddha left everything in search of truth. So many have had to lose it all before the truth finally revealed itself.
It used to puzzle me, because consciousness can reach us in gentler ways. A breakthrough thought. An intuition out of nowhere. A random morning where everything suddenly adds up. None of those require a catastrophe. So why, for some of us, does it take the whole structure coming down?
Here is the closest I've come to an answer. As long as the old self is standing, with its roles, its certainties, its identity, every insight just gets absorbed back into it. It may add a layer, but it doesn't explain the architecture, which often needs dismantling before rebuilding. A simple analogy would be remodeling a home: we can make it more appealing, but the foundational issues remain. The structure is very good at surviving new ideas; it files them away and carries on. What actually takes a structure apart is the one thing it can't absorb: our biggest fear, realized. The fear sits on top of the treasure. Unlearning is catastrophic, like a building being demolished to its core before a new one can be built. There's no map.
So the catastrophe wasn't a punishment, and it wasn't random. It was the only key that fit that particular lock. I wouldn't wish the path on anyone, and I'd never say it's the only way. But looking back, I can make sense of it. The floor I was terrified of falling through turned out to be the ground I now stand on.
I never quite understood the fleeting nature of happiness. It would arrive in events, people, places, sometimes expected, mostly unannounced. There was no recipe that worked consistently. Eventually it got old. So I tried new and different things, hoping for more encounters with it. It was hit or miss. Mostly a miss. And if that wasn't enough, one disturbing event would wipe out the possibility of being happy for months.
There were times when things got better, and I was "happier." But again, it got old. I sought it in family, friends, work, psychology, philosophy, music, tennis, travel, accomplishments.
Underneath this endless pursuit was the question that ran my whole life: Who Am I? I first asked it at five. I spent decades looking for the answer out there, in happiness and an identity.
Then I lost it all, and the question turned blunt: who am I now? The light finally shone through, and both questions, who am I and how can I be happy, were answered. It's the same answer to both. We are bliss; we are in bliss; we forget it only when we seek. It's like the deer wandering the forest for the musk that sits in its own navel.
We are all the same at the core: awareness seeking itself, love seeking itself, truth seeking itself in a house of mirrors. The seeker, seeking and sought were always One.
God was a concept I couldn't quite understand: an all-powerful creator who had the answers to all my questions, to be believed in or doubted, invoked or ignored.
God was never out there. God is the very awareness reading and writing these words, and everything else. The stillness underneath the thoughts, and the thoughts themselves. The seer, the seen, and the act of seeing, all at once. It is the act, the actor, and the audience, and so are we.
Think of the sun. There can be no rays without the sun, and we could never see the sun without its rays. The sun, its radiating, and the rays that appear are not three things. They are one. So it is with God and the world: not a maker standing apart from what it made, awarding and punishing, but the one reality appearing as all of this.
The finite exists within the infinite, and the infinite expresses itself as the finite. The wave exists in the ocean, and the ocean expresses itself as the wave. We keep looking for God the way a wave might go looking for water, never realising it was only ever water the whole time.
It's the most beautiful game of hide-and-seek: the one reality, playing at being many, hiding from itself in a billion forms, forgetting it's the source, so it can have the joy of finding itself again. Every seeker is that source, looking for what it already is. As Rumi said, what you seek is seeking you.
If God feels far, it isn't. It's only obscured, the way clouds hide the sun without ever touching it. Our thoughts, our seeking, our certainty that it must be elsewhere are the clouds. Even the darkness is part of the game. In my hardest hours, in a jail cell with no certainty of what lay ahead, a song kept ringing in my ears: tu na jaane, aas paas hai Khuda. We don't realise it, but God is within us and all around us, in hope and in despair alike.
So I don't reach up or out for God anymore. There's nowhere to reach. Call it consciousness, the Self, the Soul, love. It was never anywhere but here. God is Love, Truth and Peace, or in other words, the Bliss. Love is God, Love is Creation, and Love is also in the creating. A prayer we used to have in school: God's love is so wonderful. Oh, wonderful love!
We look for love in people: in being chosen, needed, understood. When we find it, we fear losing it. When we lose it, it takes away our peace. Somewhere along the way, love became something to earn, keep and protect.
Yet we love a sunset without asking anything of it. A song. A stranger's kindness. Love is all around us. The asking and the expectation are what hurts. What makes love feel scarce is what we attach to it: love me back, stay, don't change.
The next time love feels like a need, it helps to notice what is being asked for in return. Often it is reassurance, not love. Love was never something we lacked. It is what we are, once we stop asking to be loved back.
Every version of self is authentic. The anger is real, the grief is real, the envy and the joy are real. None of them is a mask. So the question was never which self is the true one. It was subtler: which self can you hold effortlessly, and endlessly.
Anger, envy, pride get exhausting to hold because they are situational, driven by external circumstances or validation, and hence require constant feeding. Love, peace, compassion, equanimity are innately aligned with our being.
You never need a reason to be at peace; you only ever need a reason not to be. There's a simple test I keep returning to: take any version of yourself and turn it inward. Anger turned inward becomes destruction. Envy turned inward, corrosion. Pride turned inward, delusion. But love turned inward becomes self-acceptance. Peace turned inward, stillness. Courage turned inward, honesty. The ones that can't survive the inward turn were never really yours. They belonged to the situation. Turn them inward and, finding nothing to feed on, they simply shed. Not suppressed. Not fought. Just unfed.
Thoughts take over, unannounced. The worry, the replaying, the grief, the future we keep rehearsing: all of it runs the place now. We wake in it, move through the day in it, fall asleep in it. Somewhere along the way we stopped feeling like the owner of our own mind and started feeling like a prisoner in it.
At first, thoughts arrive like welcome guests. They help us imagine, solve problems, tell stories, plan, remember fond memories. So we like them, and offer them space. But the same thoughts that bring back a good memory also drag up the painful ones. The same mind that helps us plan also builds an anxious future we then live inside. Always, they pull us out of the present. Thoughts are beautiful, and they can be brutal. The real trouble isn't having them, it's not being able to get out of them. Even meditation fails us at times, often for a simple reason: we're either thinking, or trying hard not to think. Both are just more thought.
Gradually thoughts occupy more and more mindspace: thoughts about our relationships, work, self-worth, past and the future. Each move seems reasonable on its own. Until one day we're the guest in our home, looking for a way out. The rent is paid in worry and grief.
Descartes, a French philosopher, said, I think, therefore I am. That is true of the self we usually take ourselves to be: the one made of our thoughts. Underneath the thinking is the one aware of it: here before the thought arrived, and here after it leaves.